Thursday, September 13, 2001 Volume 67, Issue 15


 
 









 
Violence grows out of violence

Renee Feltz

"We cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war."

-- Albert Einstein
The "evil" to which President Bush referred in his address to the nation Tuesday night will not go away when the United States finds those responsible for the horrible
attacks and makes them pay for the lives of the untold thousands of innocent people who were killed.

Like sacrificial lambs, those victims were made to pay for their nation's secret wars. The only way to respect their death is to oppose further U.S. violence.

First, we heard the term "mindless terrorism" thrown around by commentators in the aftermath of the attacks as everyone sat dazed, trying to make sense of the horrific
images on their television screens. Then, in the same day, we heard them echo the sentiments expressed by Bush and his cabinet -- more weapons, more defense
spending, "this will not stand!" Little attempt was made at understanding the cause for the "Attack on America."

If we knew who committed this act, it would be easier to determine what caused it. As this column went to press, no solid evidence has been found that links the
airplanes to a specific country or organization. But the answer lies partly in U.S. economic and military policies.

The Pentagon was not just behind the World Trade Center in the timing of its attack -- it was also behind the prosperity that built it.

The "hidden hand" that guided our country's free market was often a clenched "hidden fist" used at the expense of another country's freedom and our own freedom to
know what was being done in our name.

Who was killed by U.S.-backed right-wing death squads in the secret wars of Guatemala? Hundreds of thousands of civilians were deliberately massacred or
disappeared. At first, common citizens did not know of this activity. When we found out, it was explained that such events are a part of being a superpower that always
gets its way. Sometimes innocent people have to die in order for us to maintain our way of life.

Noted Middle East correspondent Robert Fisk has suggested in the British papers that we "ask an Arab how he responds to 20 or 30 thousand innocent deaths and
he or she will respond as good and decent people should, that it is an unspeakable crime.

"But then they will ask why we did not use such words about the sanctions that have destroyed the lives of perhaps half a million children in Iraq, why we did not rage
about the 17,500 civilians killed in Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon, and why we allowed one nation in the Mideast to ignore United Nations Security Council
resolutions but bombed and sanctioned all others who did."

Unfortunately, Fisk's voice is rarely heard on the channels that brought us pictures of Tuesday's attacks. And it is only after years of protest at the U.S. military's School
of the Americas, where many who were implicated in Latin American massacres and disappearances received their training, that opposition to killing in the name of
U.S. prosperity is being heard.

It is horrible to think that because Tuesday's attacks have elicited calls for war, our freedom of expression will become limited, and these voices will likely become
even more marginalized. Essentially, the protection of the way of life we've used to justify killing innocent people will begin to erode.

If history is repeated, we know that enemies will be found in those who offer possibly helpful critiques. People who are not responsible for the attack, and in fact openly
condemn attacks on innocent people, will find themselves under extreme scrutiny.

The Homeland Defense Act, which is currently under consideration in the House of Representatives, is expected to be pushed through Congress and activists are
anticipating that "the patriotic sounds and warlike ferver will cover up the faint tearing sound of the Bill of Rights and everything this country stands for."

Now that U.S. soil has been confronted by a violent response to its government's own violent policies, this should be a time of open dialogue and reassessment. Our
situation is challenging, but we must make rational decisions about the actions we take because they have the potential to escalate beyond our control.

According to polls, about nine in 10 citizens support military action against groups or nations responsible for the attacks, even if it means getting into a war. This
immediate reaction of wanting to protect ourselves and retaliate against senseless violence is no doubt understandable.

However, so long as the United States is the guarantor of global capitalism and exploitation (instead of democracy), it will be a target of those suffering from it.
Thousands more innocent people will die, many of them Americans.

True courage in honoring those killed on Tuesday requires that we change our policies and not dictate more violence. It is the difference between world peace and
world war.

Feltz, a post-baccalaureate education student, can be reached at chickpea_@hotmail.com.
 
 

To contact the Opinon Section Editor, send e-mail to dcampus@mail.uh.edu

To contact other members of 
The Daily Cougar Online staff, 


 
 
 
 
 

Advertise in The Daily Cougar

   
Student Publications
University of Houston
Houston, Texas 77204-4071

©2005, Student Publications. All rights reserved.
Permissions/Web Use Policy
http://www.uh.edu/campus/cougar/Todays/Issue/opinion/oped2.html



 

Last upThursday, September 13, 2001:

Visit The Daily Cougar