asdf
Today's Weather

Sunny weather

Hi 77 / Lo 55


Inside Menu

Student Publications
University of Houston
151C Communications Bldg
Houston, TX 77204-4015
713.743.5350

©1991-2007
Student Publications,
All rights reserved.

Last modified:

Contact:
ktruitt@uh.edu

Volume 68, Issue 118, Tuesday, March 25, 2003

Opinion
 

Staff Editorial


EDITORIAL BOARD

Matthew Dulin         Geronimo Rodriguez 
Shaun Salnave          Cara Sarelli          Lisa Street


I spy

When the Patriot Act was ratified, people cried foul, saying they had their civil liberties had been inadvertently sacrificed on the altar of defense against terrorism.

An American Civil Liberties Union challenge on those new laws was turned down by the Supreme Court on Monday. All the ACLU wanted to know was when the government should be allowed to monitor telephone conversations and e-mail exchanges to then use to prosecute a person.

Their refusal doesnit mark an official stance nor does it make any claims about the ACLUis argument. No doubt, the issue will return to the Supreme Court soon enough.

The government defends its use of wiretaps approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, or "spy court," which deals with intelligence requests involving suspected spies, terrorists or foreign agents -- only the bad guys, of course. Typically, the United States has stuck with monitoring foreign spies.

Conspiracy theorists rant about the government listening in or following you around in a black helicopter. Typically, at least, the listening in <I>is<P> legal, according to the so-called "spy-court" which has said that government officials donit have to limit their monitoring to foreign agents. Talk about freedom.

It doesnit take an extremist to feel at least a little bit wary about these new rules that were born in the chaotic wake of 9/11. Without some legal guidelines, we give the government free power to do as they please. 

Before people bring up 9/11 as the end-all, be-all reason for justifying anything, they should realize that weire not advocating total freedom. Defense is good, yes. But itis bad when itis used as an excuse to expunge oneis rights.

These broad and yet unchallenged powers are enough to make even the most patriotic citizens feel a little wary. Even the ones with "nothing to hide."

There was a premise to the Revolutionary War that had something to do with not being picked on by a big government. The same desire is in the hearts of Americans today, and that desire faces being trampled upon if post-9/11 spy laws remain in place unfettered.

With any power comes accountability, which at this point, the government simply doesnit have with regard to these tools designed to fight terrorism.

 Send comments to dccampus@mail.uh.edu

asdf
 



Tell us how we're doing.

To contact the 
OpinionSection Editor, click the e-mail link at the end of this article.

To contact other members of 
The Daily Cougar Online staff,
click here .



House Ad

Visit The Daily Cougar