The Daily Cougar Online
Today's Weather

Sunny weather

Hi 81 / Lo 73


University of Houston HomepageUniversity of Houston Department of Student PublicationsUH Houstonian YearbookWestern Association of University Publications ManagersThe Daily Cougar Online StaffThe Daily Cougar Copyright & Web Use NoticeThe Daily Cougar AwardsAbout The Daily Cougar OnlineThe Daily Cougar Campus Spotlight Online FormThe Daily Cougar Online ArchivesThe Daily Cougar Ad Rates & InformationWelcome to The Daily Cougar OnlineThe Daily Cougar Online Campus SpotlightThe Daily Cougar Online ComicsThe Daily Cougar Online Life & ArtsThe Daily Cougar Online SportsThe Daily Cougar Online OpinionThe Dailly Cougar Online News

Student Publications
University of Houston
151C Communications Bldg
Houston, TX 77204-4015
713.743.5350

©1991-2007
Student Publications,
All rights reserved.

Last modified:

Contact:
ktruitt@uh.edu

Volume 70, Issue 113, Wednesday, March 23, 2005

Opinion
 

Staff Editorial


EDITORIAL BOARD

                 Matt Dulin                   Tony Hernandez      Jim Parsons
                Jason Poland             Dusti Rhodes           Blake Whitaker


Lawmakers struggle to contain tuition monster

Like the fateful Dr. Frankenstein, the state of Texas could only sit back and watch in trepidation as the monster it created -- tuition deregulation -- wreaked havoc on higher education in the last two years. Now, the villagers are assembling and drawing up plans to subdue and contain the beast. 

Three bills have been filed in attempts to set some kind of cap on how much tuition can increase. The most heavily discussed thus far is a bill authored by Sen. Tommy Williams, R-The Woodlands, which would put a $94-per-semester-credit-hour cap on designated tuition, which is already the rate for The University of Texas at Austin. The bill would punish schools that increase tuition beyond the cap by pulling a certain amount of its state funding, which would likely only create the need for more tuition or fee hikes. 

Annual increase caps of 5 percent and 3 percent proposed by Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, and Rep. Pete Gallego, D-Alpine, respectively, would be more flexible, allowing tuition to increase more gradually. Both lawmakers have also filed bills that would take back tuition-setting powers.

It would seem counterintuitive for the government to put caps on what's supposed to be a deregulated system. If legislators aren't happy with the result of deregulated tuition, they should endorse the bills that would take tuition control away from university regents. 

One of the arguments supporting the practice is that university boards are more intimately aware of each institution's needs and thus should make a better decision about tuition. What's happened in practice is that tuition has skyrocketed, in some cases increasing by as much as 50 percent in two years. The question that needs to be asked, and answered is, why? If schools are simply trying to meet their needs, why are students bearing more of the cost? The other side of university costs -- fees -- often outpace, tuition, but this issue never reaches the Capitol; why?

Accountability is what a deregulated system needs, not arbitrary caps and threats. Put the monster on trial; then come to a judgment about whether tuition deregulation is good for Texas.

 

The Daily Cougar Online
 



Tell us how we're doing.

To contact the 
OpinionSection Editor, click the e-mail link at the end of this article.

To contact other members of 
The Daily Cougar Online staff,
click here .



House Ad

Visit The Daily Cougar