The Daily Cougar Online
Today's Weather

Sunny weather

Hi 81 / Lo 73

University of Houston HomepageUniversity of Houston Department of Student PublicationsUH Houstonian YearbookWestern Association of University Publications ManagersThe Daily Cougar Online StaffThe Daily Cougar Copyright & Web Use NoticeThe Daily Cougar AwardsAbout The Daily Cougar OnlineThe Daily Cougar Campus Spotlight Online FormThe Daily Cougar Online ArchivesThe Daily Cougar Ad Rates & InformationWelcome to The Daily Cougar OnlineThe Daily Cougar Online Campus SpotlightThe Daily Cougar Online ComicsThe Daily Cougar Online Life & ArtsThe Daily Cougar Online SportsThe Daily Cougar Online OpinionThe Dailly Cougar Online News

Student Publications
University of Houston
151C Communications Bldg
Houston, TX 77204-4015

Student Publications,
All rights reserved.

Last modified:


Volume 70, Issue 161, Thursday, August 4, 2005


Staff Editorial


                 Matt Dulin                   Sam Khan, Jr.      Tina Marie Macias
                Jason Poland             Dusti Rhodes           Blake Whitaker


Official academic fairness policy a tightrope

Ever felt that a professor graded your work unfairly because you expressed a viewpoint that opposed his or her own? If so, the federal government may be on your side.

A bill passed by a House of Representatives committee calls on universities to provide for "intellectual pluralism" and encourage professors to express dissenting viewpoints. 

Though the bill is largely symbolic in that it's not tied to federal funding in any way, the message Congress is trying to send is clear.

Some states have called for official legislation outlining measures professors must take to ensure that students who hold opposing viewpoints aren't marginalized or discriminated against. 

Not a bad idea, considering the potential for bad apples to create discriminatory environments.

There are some dangers involved in an "academic bill of rights," however. Professors are not grade school teachers -- they are allowed certain freedoms in developing their lesson plans and determining the style in which they choose to present material for a reason.

Excessive control of professors by government bodies would seriously detract from what is supposed to make a university education so valuable -- learning material firsthand from the top experts in various fields. 

Anything that would predetermine what a professor is allowed to teach at a public institution would be a serious breach of their academic freedom.

As long as protective measures aren't allowed to be too far-reaching and powerful and only applied in appropriate situations, however, they could go a long way toward making students feel more comfortable with the objectivity of their grades and help dispel the negative image of the overzealous, discriminatory instructor.

It's the government's burden, then, to tread carefully, protecting students from unfair 

treatment while remaining as uninvolved as possible.

The Daily Cougar Online

Tell us how we're doing.

To contact the 
OpinionSection Editor, click the e-mail link at the end of this article.

To contact other members of 
The Daily Cougar Online staff,
click here .

House Ad

Visit The Daily Cougar